Unfortunately, the article you cite is behind a paywall subscription required.
Naproxen is my choice of pain reliever when I need one because of its long half-life and relative safety profile. One tablet usually does the job and the effects last a long time.
More than you wanted to know about Naproxen:
"Dr.Oracle: “Naproxen has relatively strong pain-relieving (analgesic) effects compared to other NSAIDs. In studies comparing the efficacy of various NSAIDs, naproxen has been found to provide similar or greater pain relief than other options like ibuprofen.”
Naproxen has a relatively favorable safety profile compared to other NSAIDs. It has lower rates of gastrointestinal side effects like ulcers and bleeding than drugs like ibuprofen or aspirin. Naproxen is associated with fewer cardiovascular risks like heart attack and stroke compared to other traditional NSAIDs as well. However, naproxen may be more likely to cause fluid retention and high blood pressure than some alternatives. And its long half-life could increase the risk of adverse effects with sustained use. Overall, naproxen is generally considered one of the safer NSAID options, though side effects are still possible. Using the lowest effective dose for the shortest time can help minimize naproxen’s risks."
“The half-life of naproxen is approximately 12-15 hours. This means it takes around 12-15 hours for the level of naproxen in the body to be reduced by half after a dose is taken. Naproxen has a relatively long half-life compared to other NSAIDs like ibuprofen, which has a half-life of only 2-4 hours. The longer half-life of naproxen can be advantageous in providing longer-lasting pain
relief”
Safety:
"The cohort included 48566 patients recently hospitalized for myocardial infarction, revascularization, or unstable angina pectoris with more than 111000 person-years of follow-up. Naproxen users had the lowest adjusted rates of serious coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease death) and serious cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, stroke)/death from any cause, with respective incidence rate ratios (relative to NSAID nonusers) of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.17) and 0.91 (0.78 to 1.06). Risk did not increase with doses >or=1000 mg. Relative to NSAID nonusers, serious coronary heart disease risk increased with short term (<90 days) use for ibuprofen (1.67 [1.09 to 2.57]), diclofenac (1.86 [1.18 to 2.92]), celecoxib (1.37 [0.96 to 1.94]), and rofecoxib (1.46 [1.03 to 2.07]), but not for naproxen (0.88 [0.50 to 1.55]). Relative to naproxen, current users of diclofenac had increased risk of serious coronary heart disease (1.44 [0.96 to 2.15], P=0.076) and serious cardiovascular disease/death (1.52 [1.22 to 1.89], P=0.0002), and those of ibuprofen had increased risk of the latter end point (1.25 [1.02 to 1.53], P=0.032). Compared to naproxen in doses >or=1000 mg, serious coronary heart disease incidence rate ratios were increased for rofecoxib >25 mg (2.29 [1.24 to 4.22], P=0.008) and celecoxib >200 mg (1.61 [1.01 to 2.57], P=0.046).
Conclusions: In patients recently hospitalized for serious coronary heart disease, naproxen had better cardiovascular safety than did diclofenac, ibuprofen, and higher doses of celecoxib and rofecoxib."