#21

Right if the are all collected at one point in time and not just the best results he has ever achieved in each category.

1 Like
#22

He works out, very religiously, and uses HIIT. He also does TRT.

2 Likes
#23

I thought he stopped TRT quite some time ago?

2 Likes
#24

He stopped HGH. I heard him within the last year say he’s supplementing Testosterone to offset the decrease from his other interventions.

3 Likes
#25

Yet sees it fit to brag over how many hours of bonertime he can produce a night?

2 Likes
#28

I’d feel pretty uncomfortable with these timings. I wouldn’t look forward to waiting them out for like 3h when I wake up to pee.

1 Like
#29

His erection time is amazing and is a sign of a great REM sleep.

1 Like
#30

I’ve looked around but cannot find the source page for this table… has anyone found it? I’d like to check the “references” he links to in the “Percentile” columns…

IMG_7571
IMG_75711546×824 367 KB

#31

Do you know of any reliable reference range for ApoA1? Most doctors seem to think it’s nearly irrelevant (at least they don’t order it in lipid panels). My wife’s is extremely low (23.8 mg/dL) but I can’t find any research of how problematic that’s predicted to be. She does also have some signs of lipedema and I’ve often wondered if this ApoA reading is indicative or causative of that

1 Like
#32

I find this worrying. Also, how does he know the statistical distribution of stamina in bed of men in their 20s?

It has the contrary effect on me, it prevents me from sleeping.

And flaunting his nocturnal erection time ‘as long as the Titanic film’ sounds a little deranged to me.

I agree with some of the comments above, he may have gained excellent health markers, but maybe he has lost some mental balance.

9 Likes
#33

When I get the lipid panel at UCLA, the use ARUP Laboratories for the Apo profile. For ApoA1, they give the range of 104mg/dL - 202mg/dL. How they come up with that range, I’m not sure, but in the evaluation portion, they seem to imply that it’s based on outcomes in their measured population. Mine came in at 212mg/dL, and got flagged as “HIGH”.

Antoine came up with this - Serum apolipoproteins and mortality risk: evidence from observational and Mendelian randomization analyses:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0002916524000029

“After adjusting for potential confounders including high-density and low-density lipoprotein particles, we observed nonlinear inverse relationships of APOA1 with all-cause, CVD-related, and cancer-related mortality (P -nonlinear < 0.001).”

1 Like
#34

A little? :joy:

/////////////

2 Likes
#35

image

“In psychometric terms, 100% trait Openness”.

2 Likes
#36

Hi numbers are remarkable and juvenile criticisms are more reflection of the poster more than BJ
I have only 5 or 6 that are close to his and think I was doing ok but he has set a standard to shoot for.
Although he has attracted lots of jealous critics, I think what he is doing is quite remarkable. The work he has put into making sure his supplements are actually delivering what the label says and are low in heavy metals is another great accomplishment imo.

5 Likes
#37

A lot of 50-year-old people have same biomarkers as him but doesn’t mean they are 20 years old. Simply means they are healthy and good for him and them, so the notion that your BP is 109/65 and its better than a 20-year old’s doesn’t quite hold. To me, his biomarkers are simply good/normal (healthy) and no better than anybody that is also healthy. Yes, I agree he brought attention to the field.

3 Likes
#38

80% of people who are 50 are metabolically unhealthy. I doubt even 1% have 10% of his numbers
I don’t know your age but doubt you know many 50 yo’s numbers.
When I was 50 I had no biometrics close to BJ’s and I was in better shape and health than 99% of my peers

4 Likes
#40

Right, and that’s hard to reconcile with his flaunting of exceptional virility. Again, as posted before, pretty high on the weirdness scale, but that’s part of his appeal I reckon.

3 Likes
#41

When you are 50+, you must be conscious of your health and biomarkers. Otherwise, they probably will be shite. I agree with Paul that most 50+ yo aren’t in great health in the USA. Here in Hong Kong, I’d say people are healthier. It’s probably closer to the population of Denver, CO than the USA as a whole.

It could be why we have the highest lifespan in the world. :wink:

4 Likes
#42

Sharing this is probably a good way to give his content an additional viral boost.

But the real question is… What’s everyone’s plan to beat him on this metric?

#43

Perhaps the first question is the extent to which people measure this metric

I think it is also linked to the absence of nocturnal micturation. Personally, however, I prefer to reduce the pressure.

1 Like