Iām here to figure out if the AI from Good labs is correct in advising me to take methylated folate.
My homocysteine levels jumped from 6 to 11.
There is a chance itās not my folate levels because I was very recently experimenting with NAD subq injections (not a high dose and only a handful of times), but due to my CVD, Iām stopping out of an abundance of caution.
Also,
I had the Vibrant Micronutrient Test done last Jan, and it and my doc said my folate numbers were good, and due to my WFPB diet, that tracksā¦. Butā¦.
After uploading those results in Good Labs, their AI told to me part of my problem might be my low folate (a human confirmed it). After some googling, it seems that the Vibrant test uses a lower optimal range, but because the ranges donāt seem to be universally accepted, I wanted to double check and get everyoneās thoughts.
It showed my serum folate was >20 ng/ml, and Vibrants ref range said anything over 4.6 ng/ml is goodā¦
It showed my RBC folate was 239 ng/ml, and their ref range shows that anything over 95 ng/ml is good
Howeverā¦
I was told RBC is a more important measure, and 239 ng/ml shows Iām low and might be contributing to my higher homocysteine. Goodlabs ref range shows it should be above 333. Health Matters IO says their optimal range is 499 - 1504 ng/mL.
Before I add yet one more supplement to my huge stack, I just wanted to see if the hivemind knows better than what Iām reading.
Thank you!
Also, while I have you, how long should I wait for a new homocysteine lab to show a change?