"Why 94 is the new 54 for moguls"

[José]

This article is behind a pay wall

Can someone extract a copy?

https://www.ft.com/content/99984892-60ec-4d59-8c14-b20439f9e1c0

[John_Hemming]

This is a sharing link, but I don’t know how many times it will work.

https://on.ft.com/46RYG9V

[RapAdmin]

Already posted here, over a day ago:

Billionaire Longevity Escape Velocity (B-LEV): Is this going to be an Issue?

From today’s Financial Times of London: [Screenshot 2025-10-02 at 10.41.51 AM] Why 94 is the new 54 for moguls The careers of moguls are growing to unprecedented lengths Rupert Murdoch’s media empire will pass to his eldest son Lachlan when (or if) the 94-year-old mogul dies. Rupert’s mother lived to 103, but that was before modern medical advances. Warren Buffett, who will step down from Berkshire Hathaway by the end of this year, aged 95, remarked recently: “I didn’t really start getting old, for some strange reason, until I was about 90.” Giorgio Armani told the FT, days before he died at the age of 91, “My greatest weakness is that I am in control of everything,” right down to micromanaging a museum exhibition. These men seem to be trying to make reality of the old Woody Allen joke about immortality: “I don’t want to live on in the hearts of my countrymen; I want to live on in my apartment.” Moguls’ careers have grown to unprecedented lengths, thanks partly to innovations l…