EnrQay
#2
Adoptive NK cell therapy sounds very promising for elimination of senescent cells. It might give better targeting in a broader number of tissues that small molecules could.
Our research group has pioneered a feeder-cell-free method for substantial NK cell expansion
I wonder what this means?
Kill those zombie cells!!
Cohen
#4
Chelyapov et al., described a studying in vitro where activated NK cells attack SNCs on highly cooperated level [27]. They assessed the senescent markers, p16 and β-galactosidase, in PBMCs before and after adoptive NK cell therapy from 5 healthy individuals, supporting the removal of immunosenescent cells in human [27]. Similarly, Tang et al., uncovered that senescence and exhaustion T cells were eliminated, and the secretions of SASP factors were decreased after adoptive NK cell therapy [26].
Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), upregulated on SNCs across different cell types, was paralleled with β-galactosidase-positive cells. Plasma levels of soluble uPAR positively correlate with the pace of aging in humans. uPAR chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can eliminate SNCs and improve aging-associated metabolic dysfunction [57]. Therefore, uPAR may serve as a suitable candidate biomarker of therapeutic efficacy.
Whether or not these macrophages are truly ‘senescent’ or have an alternative cell state is a topic of debate; regardless, given that we observe a fraction of uPAR-expressing macrophages that also coexpress SA-β-gal and senescence-associated transcriptional signatures accumulating in aged tissues, it seems likely that their elimination contributes to the phenotypes we observe.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-023-00560-5