DrRoss
#1
Hi,
A friend gifted me with a book titled CANARY In A COVID World. I’ve read volume 1……now reading volume 2. These books are explosive. Much of the info I was aware of, but much of the documentation & details revealed in files & reports from Freedom of Information Act disclosures is interesting, shocking, and disturbing. I received permission from the publisher to reproduce and distribute two chapters from volume 1 in an effort to publicize
the availability of these books, and the pandemic & COVID vaccine-related problems. I’ve tried to attach the pdf files of these 2 chapters…but don’t know if the forum platform will allow you to access them. If not…request them by emailing me at: rosspelton70@gmail.com
VAERS.pdf (165.7 KB)
ACOG.pdf (367.8 KB)
7 Likes
KarlT
#2
Thanks for this. I’m a bit afraid to read them. I’m already so irritated at the way our government handled the whole situation. So wrong on so many levels. I won’t expand on that as there are too many people on this forum who are anti freedom.
3 Likes
LaraPo
#3
PDF attachments work OK. Thank you for posting them. The info is really troubling.
1 Like
Ross,
We try to avoid rehashing old Covid issues here because because it seems to simply devolve into a political argument with nobody being swayed in any significant way. A quick search on the internet seems to indicate that Jessica Rose is a very outspoken anti-vaxxer with many podcasts and writings on the web.
Lots of groups seem to have debunked her claims and I’m sure other groups have debunked the debunkers… it seems like an endless fight that is not the focus of this website. So - I’ll just point people towards some of the counter arguments and then I’m locking this thread as I don’t think its of much interest to most people here, but if people want to dig into the Covid vaccine / anti-vaccination arguments - feel free to do so on Reddit or other platform. This isn’t the best place for this discussion as its such a popular topic in other forums and platforms.
Reuters is recognized as a good, reputable and even-handed news platform, and here is one story from it:
Rose and Crawford’s paper calculates a so-called “underreporting rate” of adverse reactions by comparing data submitted to VAERS on anaphylaxis (severe allergic reaction) after vaccination with estimates of people vaccinated in the United States. They then subtract the average number of background deaths for previous years from the deaths after vaccination reported to VAERS before multiplying the resulting number by their estimated underreporting rate. They say these calculations produce an estimated total of more than 150,000 people who have died in the United States as a result of COVID-19 vaccines.
An FDA spokesperson told Reuters in an email that it "strongly disagrees” with the analysis put forth in the report.
Reuters previously addressed a similar document containing the claim that COVID-19 vaccines have killed more than 150,000 people, along with other miscalculations using VAERS data, here.
False claims of death using VAERS data were also addressed by Reuters here as well as misrepresentations of VAERS data here.
VERDICT
False. COVID-19 vaccines are safe and there is no evidence to suggest they have caused more than 150,000 deaths. The claim is based on misinterpreted data.
This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checking work here.
https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/vaers-data-does-not-suggest-covid-19-vaccines-killed-150000-people-as-analysis-idUSL1N2R00KP/
2202.04204v1.pdf (155.0 KB)
11 Likes
