I would say the blood sirolimus tests right now are of most value when taken just before your next dose, to see what your trough levels are. You want to get low trough levels before repeated dosing so that over time you are not significantly blocking mTORC2, and thus triggering the negative effects that go along with it. But if you’re doing regular (say quarterly) blood testing on CBC/HS-CRP, etc. and getting good results - then perhaps you don’t really need the blood sirolimus trough levels. Certainly I’ve been getting along with out doing the blood sirolimus testing. Most of us here probably have not done the blood sirolimus testing.
On the optimal dose side of the equation; absolutely we have little idea on what the optimal dose for healthy humans for longevity purposes is. We have lots of data on lab-based mice and soon monkeys, but they live in largely pathogen-free environments so I’m not sure how well those data translate to us (and it will likely be highly variable - if you’re a software engineer working at home you have a low risk profile, if you’re a medical professional working in an ER room you may have an entirely different and higher risk profile due to exposure risks).
I’m going to be testing higher dosing, and different dosing periods, with extensive blood testing before and after, just so I get a good handle on how my body processes rapamycin and what my “curves” look like in terms of blood levels over time. And I’ll track all the standard CBC, blood test results to see how things are impacted over time (I may also add a CGM to the mix to track blood sugars).
You mention “Just if side effects kick in, reduce your intake.”
I would say that this is also an area of lack of consensus. There are two types of side effects we see; physical side effects (e.g. rashes, mouth sores, etc.), and blood-based marker side effects (eg. lipid increases, blood glucose increase, etc.).
For the first type of side effects - its going to be a personal decision on what is tolerable… I had a mouth sore once it went away, no big deal. I’ve had rashes that persisted for weeks… a bit bigger deal, but still tolerable and they eventually went away. Its going to be a personal decision depending on the severity and frequency of the side effect.
Then on the blood-based marker side effect - you face a decision; do you lower the dose, or do you tolerate the side effect (within a given range), or do you treat the side effect (eg. by adding a statin, or other lipid management medication). There are no standards and no studies on this type of thing - so again, its going to be an individual’s call on what to do here. I had higher LDL-C lipids prior to starting rapamycin and had been off and on statins for years. When my lipids when higher I became more rigorous about taking my statin and I added bempadoic acid and ezetimibe - and now I’m in the low 60s for LDL-C (down from the 140 to 200 range prior). This has just been my approach, but I’m not necessarily recommending it to anyone else. You need to do your research and figure out what works for you.