Ok so I plugged the new study in ChatGPT and this is what I got back for anyone curious
I found the actual study you referenced — “A Metabolic Atlas of Mouse Aging” (Pilley, Awad, Latumalea, Kennedy, Lyssiotis, Mullen, et al.) — and here’s how it affects the big picture on NAD and aging: 
What the new study actually did
• It quantified metabolites across 12 organs in mice at multiple ages to map how metabolism changes with age. 
• It created organ-specific metabolic aging clocks and identified metabolic predictors of age and aging trajectories. 
• They found distinct metabolic shifts in aging tissues and sex-dependent differences in how metabolites change. 
So this is a massively broad metabolomic dataset — the largest of its kind — that moves aging research past single pathways to a holistic metabolic landscape.
⸻
What this study does not show
It is not primarily about NAD⁺ decline — the study doesn’t overturn decades of prior research that NAD⁺ tends to decrease in aging tissues. (The core design is metabolome mapping, not mechanistic NAD biology.) 
It doesn’t claim “NAD⁺ doesn’t decline with age.” The atlas likely documents changes in NAD and related metabolites across tissues, but it does not overturn the overall aging trend seen in prior studies. (If anything, the supplemental data indicate NAD levels change with age — but the pattern is complex.) 
In other words:
The atlas adds rich data on how metabolism changes with age across organs.
It doesn’t negate the general observation that NAD⁺ declines with age.
⸻
How this study refines our understanding — but doesn’t overturn it
1. Aging isn’t uniform across tissues
The atlas shows that metabolites often change in organ-specific ways — some decline sharply, others plateau, and some change non-linearly with age. This hints that:
• NAD changes likely don’t follow a single linear model across all tissues
• Some tissues may maintain NAD better than others
• Metabolic aging signatures are not uniform — they can be sex-dependent too 
This matches broader aging data showing heterogeneity in metabolic aging.
⸻
2. NAD decline is contextual, not absolute
The study’s scope strengthens the idea that:
• Some pathways compensate for changes in others
• Redox metabolism and nucleotide metabolism (which includes NAD intermediates) shift with age
• Metabolic clocks integrate many metabolites, not just NAD-centric ones
Basically: NAD is one piece of a larger metabolic aging puzzle. Decline in NAD is real, but the biological context is more complex than “declines everywhere at the same rate.”
⸻
3. It reinforces metabolic aging as a network effect
Earlier frameworks treated NAD-decline as a somewhat isolated phenomenon tied to CD38, PARPs, and salvage pathways. This atlas suggests:
• Many metabolite pathways interact
• Aging is best tracked by multi-metabolite signatures, not single variables
• Predictors like alpha-ketoglutarate and hydroxyproline emerged as aging indicators across tissues 
So NAD is part of a broader metabolic shifting landscape, not a lone rate-limiting aging variable.
⸻
Implication for human aging and activity
This is important for your original question about NAD levels in extremely active, fit humans:
The study supports that metabolic aging is heterogeneous — different tissues and pathways shift at different rates.
NAD likely does decline in many tissues with age, but the extent and pattern vary.
Lifestyle factors (exercise, low inflammation, low visceral fat) modulate these pathways — potentially preserving some metabolic profiles.
But it does not overturn the fact that NAD declines with age on average, even in active adults — it just shows the story is more nuanced and tissue-dependent.
It also emphasizes that we should think about aging as a network of metabolites and pathways, not just NAD. 
⸻
Updated Bottom Line (Based on the New Paper)
Does this new “Metabolic Atlas of Mouse Aging” change the core conclusion?
It refines it. Aging changes metabolism in complex, organ-specific ways.
It contextualizes NAD within a wider metabolic shift, not as a single universal “aging meter.”
✘ It does not nullify the general finding that NAD declines with age.
So:
NAD decline with aging — even in healthy, active individuals — remains supported.
The new study emphasizes that aging effects vary by organ and interact with many metabolic pathways.