"N-Acetylcysteine ethyl ester (NACET): A novel lipophilic cell-permeable cysteine derivative with remarkable antioxidant potential"

[José]

Biochemical Pharmacology

Volume 84, Issue 11, 1 December 2012, Pages 1522-1533

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006295212006417

[DeStrider]

NACET is 10X more potent than NAC yet the dose is 1/10th that of NAC. So it seems like a wash to me except NACET is much more expensive.

[LukeMV]

I wish they studied NACET more because it has the potential to be far superior to NAC. Just wish the supplement manufacturers didn’t insist on including Molybdenum with it.

[José]

@LukeMV

“studied NACET more because it has the potential to be far superior to NAC.”

Yes it is, that is why I take/have been taken what I call “GlyNACET” the published paper protocol/dosing using NACET{600mg to 800mg per day] instead of NAC.

[José]

Review the following;

phd_unisi_107163.pdf.pdf (8.4 MB)

[KarlT]

I would think the required prerequisite assumption is that NAC is good for you?