@John_Hemming are you the John Hemmings referenced in the article? It sounds like it’s you. 
2 Likes
Yes.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-hemming-77b65110/
https://twitter.com/johnhemming4mp
10 Likes
John,
I love the write-up on you. This author is a bit confused and slanted - but that is the nature of things. It is always a wild card being interviewed, as the author can make you look like a fool or genius.
You came off pretty unscathed!
It is a problem for amateurs in this area to author, as the temptation to simplify things is there, which was done here. As we all know, it is much more complex. A vigorous debate, and humility going forward is important. Sinclair’s crime, if there is one, has been providing more certainty than existed - and naturally, you are going to be wrong on a significant portion of things you believe to be true - and often for good cause.
When I graduated medical school in 1994 - the dogma was 50% of the stuff you’ve been taught is wrong - now you’ll spend the next 20 years sorting out which 50% that is.
Anyway - I really enjoyed reading this - and luckily, you came off without getting slighted!
10 Likes